
 |
| Ng enters courtroom (AP) |
After dozens of appeals and a seemingly endless round of
hearings, the Canadian government finally acceded to the Californian
government's request and agreed to extradite Charles Ng on September
26, 1991. Within minutes of his release, Ng was flown to
McClellan Air Force base where he was transferred to Folsom prison
in Sacramento to await trial. What followed were the most
drawn out, costly criminal proceedings in US criminal history, even
outstripping the infamous O.J. Simpson case. Ng used every
point of law that he and his string of attorneys could muster to
delay trial proceedings against him.
|
|
The site for the trial was to be San Andreas but Ng constantly
filed actions against the state of California, making formal
complaints on matters ranging from alleged poor treatment and bad
food to the claim that he was forced to take medication for motion
sickness during the fifty-mile trip to the courthouse, which he
claimed, made him drowsy and unable to take part in pre-trial
proceedings. He gained further delays by dismissing his
attorneys at regular intervals and later filed a $1 million
malpractice suit against them for incompetence. At one stage
he filed a motion with the San Andreas court applying for the right
to represent himself but later withdrew it.
The delaying tactics continued as Ng's attorneys applied to have
the trial moved to Orange County as they believed that their client
would not receive a fair trial in San Andreas. In support of
this motion the attorneys tabled an independent survey indicating
that 95% of the residents of Calaveras County already considered
Charles Ng guilty of the Wilseyville murders. These and other
motions were brought before the California Supreme court no less
than five times until finally, on April 8, 1994, a San Andreas judge
upheld the motion and ordered the trial moved to Santa Ana in Orange
County. This action caused further delays when Orange County
officials objected to the order on the grounds that the county was
virtually bankrupt and unable to bear the costs of such a
trial. The issue was eventually resolved when the state of
California agreed to pay any costs incurred.
 |
| Ng in court, under guard (AP) |
More years of legal wrangling ensued as Ng changed attorneys who
in turn asked for further adjournments to prepare their case.
At one point during the proceedings, Ng was housed in a small cage
between appearances, as he was considered "highly
dangerous." The cage was later removed when a Federal
magistrate described its use as "barbarous." Even
before the actual trial began, Ng had appeared before six different
judges in a case that had amassed over six tons of evidence and
other legal documents at a cost approaching $10 million.
|
 |
| Prosecutor Sharlene Honnaka (AP) |
In October 1998 after thirteen years of delays and extended legal
arguments, the trial of Charles Chitat Ng began. For the next
few months, the jury, the media and the families and friends of the
victims, heard state prosecutor Sharlene Honnaka relate how Leonard
Lake and Charles Ng had selected and kidnapped their victims before
taking them to the Wilseyville site where they sadistically
tortured, raped and murdered them. To support the state's
case, Honnaka submitted the videos that were found at the site that
clearly showed Ng and Lake torturing and abusing Kathy Allen and
Brenda O'Connor. Evidence, including stolen property and
photographs were also tabled further linking both men to the
victims. Honnaka also attempted to submit excerpts from Lake's
diaries as evidence but Judge John J. Ryan refused to admit them,
ruling that most of the material submitted bore no relevance to the
case. Part of Lake's military record was also
withheld.
|
|
The defence countered, claiming that Ng was an unwilling
accomplice to the more dangerous and demented Lake who was
responsible for the murders while Ng merely participated in
some of the sexual offences. Towards the end of the
proceedings, Ng damaged his own case when he insisted on taking the
stand, a move which allowed prosecutors to present additional
evidence, including a picture of Ng in his cell showing the
incriminating cartoons behind him on the wall next to a motto which
read, "No kill, no thrill - no gun, no fun."
 |
| William Kelly (AP) |
William Kelley, Ng's court appointed attorney, attempted to
regroup by calling Claralyn Balasz to give evidence in support of
his client even though the prosecution had previously granted her
immunity. He later changed his mind when Judge Ryan advised
him that Balasz had made prior statements implicating Ng.
|
 |
Ng sits passively as his sentence
is read
(AP) |
Finally, after a trial lasting eight long months, all the
evidence had been heard and the jury retired to consider a
verdict. Within hours they returned. They found Charles
Chitat Ng guilty of the murder of six men, three women and two baby
boys. The charge of murdering the seventh man, Paul Cosner, had
been dropped previously owing to insufficient evidence. |
 |
 |
 |
Families of
the victims react to the verdict
(AP) |
|
|
Judge Ryan then followed the jury's recommendation and imposed a
sentence of death even though he had the option of sentencing Ng to
life imprisonment.
|
|

|