|
By mid-April, the Kitty Genovese story had taken hold and the
nation began a lengthy period of analysis and self-deprecation. Why
would civilized people turn away from another human being in dire
need of assistance? As the details of the killing emerged, it became
plain that if any one of the 38 witnesses had simply called the
police at the first sign of trouble, the victim could have survived.
The initial stab wounds inflicted may not have been fatal. Timely
medical treatment could have saved the life of Catherine
Genovese.
 |
Photo: The Kew Gardens
LIRR station located just off Austin Street. (photo by
author) |
|
|
Were the witnesses really that cold-hearted? People wondered.
Some psychologists blamed television for the sad state of affairs in
Kew Gardens. In a symposium held in Manhattan’s Barbizon Plaza
Hotel in early April 1964, psychiatrist Ralph S. Banay said
television was at least partly to blame. “We underestimate the
damage that these accumulated images do to the brain,” he said,
“The immediate effect can be delusional, equivalent to a sort of
post-hypnotic suggestion.” The witnesses became confused, and
paralyzed by the violence they witnessed outside their window, he
explained. “They were fascinated by the drama, by the action, and
yet not entirely sure that what was taking place was actually
happening,” he said.
That explanation fit in neatly with what some of the witnesses
had told police. They claimed that when they saw the disturbance on
Austin Street, they imagined it was an argument between man and wife
or boyfriend and girlfriend. None really thought that they were
witnessing a real killing. “We thought it was a lover’s
quarrel,” one witness said later. Another neighbor repeated that
assertion when he said, “I thought they were some kids having some
fun!” Others complained of the media attention and said the press
made the neighborhood look bad. “These things happen every day all
over the world,” one neighbor told a reporter, “The stories were
only giving us a black eye!”
Dr. Karl Menninger, a world-renowned psychiatrist and founder of
the Menninger Clinic in Topeka, Kansas, also spoke at the symposium.
“Public apathy to crime is itself a manifestation of
aggressiveness,” he told the audience. People turn away for a
variety of reasons, including their desire “not to get
involved.”
But were people in big cities more apathetic, colder and
indifferent than others in more rural environments? Or was the
“Kitty Genovese Syndrome,” as some psychologists characterized
it, indicative of society as a whole?
One dynamic brought forth was the Bystander Effect. This theory
speculates that as the “number of bystanders increases, the
likelihood of any one bystander helping another decreases.” As a
result, additional time will pass before anyone seeks outside help
for a person in distress. Another hypothesis is something called the
Diffusion of Responsibility. This is simply a decrease in the
feeling of personal responsibility one feels when in the presence of
many other people. The greater the number of bystanders, the less
responsibility the individual feels. In cases where there are many
people present during an emergency, it becomes much more likely that
any one individual will simply do nothing.
In essence, the 38 witnesses felt no responsibility to act because
there were so many witnesses. Each one felt that the other witness
would do something. Social psychology research supports the notion
that Catherine Genovese had a better chance of survival if she had
been attacked in the presence of just one witness.
|