|
Of course the abduction of Mandy Smith made Black a prime suspect
for Hector Clark, as the MO was strikingly similar to that in the
cases of Susan, Caroline and Sarah. When Clark
first saw Black following his arrest in July 1990 he remembers,
“Slowly he looked up at me and my gut feeling was that this was
my man. I had always thought that when I saw him I would know
him and every instinct told me this was the guy. I knew by his
body smell and his dishevelled appearance. Except that he was
bald, he was just as I expected.”
But "gut feeling" and "instinct" are not good
enough. In spending so much time analysing such crimes, the
police inevitably start to feel that they know the offenders in
certain ways. They think they know what they will look like
and how they will behave. George Oldfield, heading the
Yorkshire Ripper inquiry, similarly said on several occasions that
if he were in a room full of potential suspects he would instantly
'know' his man. But as the Ripper investigation showed us,
this is a dangerous assumption. Peter Sutcliffe was
interviewed nine times during the course of the five-year
investigation, but nobody 'recognised' him.
In the hope of eliciting some incriminating evidence, the police
decided to interview Black. As he was already serving a life
sentence they thought that he might be willing to talk about any
other crimes he had committed. Interviewed in Scotland, Black
talked candidly to officers about the offences for which he had
previously been convicted, for the best part of six hours. He
was frank about a variety of topics, including his one proper
relationship with a woman, his attraction to little girls, the
sexual abuse he had endured as a child, his fantasy life, and his
masturbatory practices. Eventually however, when the officers
asked Black about his work with Poster Dispatch and Storage and his
whereabouts on the day of Caroline Hogg’s abduction, he fell
silent. When it came to the abductions and murders of the
three little girls, Black would simply not talk to the police.
It was apparent that the police would have to find their evidence
the hard way, through old-fashioned, painstaking detective work:
they were going to have to look at Black's life over the past eight
years. In most cases the tracing of a person's daily movements
over the past decade would prove an impossible task, but in this
case the police were fortuitous due to the nature of Black's work.
From a careful examination of work records, wage books, and receipts
from fuel credit cards, the police were able to begin tracing
Black's life.
Susan Maxwell's abduction had taken place in Coldstream on 30
July 1982. It was the task of the police to establish where
Black was at every stage during that day. The first step in
the process was to see whether PDS had records of journeys carried
out by drivers dating that far back. The police were initially
dismayed to find that potentially vital company records had been
destroyed just months beforehand, as was company policy after a
certain length of time had elapsed. Yet new hope arose when it
was established that the wage books from that time were still
available. As different runs command different wages it was
established - from the amount of money that Black received in his
pay - that he must have done the London-Scotland run sometime
between 29 July and 4 August.
The time still needed narrowing down, however. The police
next looked at petrol receipts from the company's fuel credit cards
that all drivers carried and it was established that Black had been
in the Borders area on 30 July. He had filled up his white
Fiat van just south of Coldstream before the time that Susan was
snatched, and just north of Coldstream after the time of her
abduction. The quickest route between the two garages was the
A687, directly through Coldstream. Black had previously told
his work-mates that when returning from a Scottish-run he preferred
not to take the most direct route (which was the M6 to the M1) but
to get to the M1 via the A50 through the Midlands. Susan's
body was found by the A518 in Staffordshire, not far from the
junction for the A50.
The case against Black for the murder of Caroline Hogg was built
in a similarly meticulous fashion. On 8 July 1982, the day of
Caroline's abduction, it was established that Black had delivered
posters to Mills and Allen in Piershill, just over a mile north of
Portobello. Petrol receipts showed that he had filled up at a
petrol station in Belford, Northumberland, on this day and that the
most obvious route from Belford to his delivery point in Piershill
was through Portobello. The post-mortem had found that
Caroline's body had been kept by her killer for four days after her
abduction - dead or alive, they could not determine - making the
12th the first day on which her body could have been disposed.
On this day Black had delivered posters to Bedworth, just over ten
miles from where Caroline's body was found.
The circumstantial evidence for the case of Sarah Harper was
equally strong. On 26 March, the day of her abduction, Black
had delivered posters to a depot just 150 yards from the place that
Sarah was last seen. Petrol receipts from the next day put
Black as driving directly past the spot on the A453 to Nottingham
where Sarah's body had been deposited.
In addition to the growing mountain of circumstantial evidence
another incident came to Clark's notice. On 28 April 1988,
15-year-old Teresa Thornhill had been to the park with some friends.
Teresa walked part of the way home with one of these friends, Andrew
Beeson. Just after she and Andrew had gone their separate
ways, Teresa noticed that a blue van had stopped just ahead of her
on the opposite side of the road; the driver had got out and was
looking under the bonnet. As she approached, the man shouted
to her: "Can you mend engines?" Uneasily she replied
that she could not and walked on. The next thing she knew, the
man had grabbed her from behind, picked her up and was carrying her
across to his van. She said later:
"I will never forget his hairy arms, sweaty hands and smelly
T-shirt. He came over to me and got me in an all-encompassing
bear hug which I could not get out of because he was very strong.
I tried to struggle free and began shouting for my mum. I was
looking around for something to hit him with, but there was nothing
there. Then I grabbed him between the legs."
She also knocked his glasses to the ground, screaming all the
while. Teresa's friend Andrew heard her screams and ran
towards the van shouting, "Get off her, you fat fucking
bastard." Teresa's struggle and Andrew's timely arrival
meant that her attacker had little choice but to drop his victim and
make his get-away.
Unfortunately, at the time there was nothing to obviously link
Teresa's attack to the abductions and murders of Susan, Caroline and
Sarah. Most importantly, these girls were aged between five
and 11, whereas Teresa was 15, nearly a woman. Teresa looked
far younger than her years, however: she was under five feet tall,
with a girlish figure, and wore no make-up. She did not look
like a teenager. If this had been taken into account at the
time, the abductions would have seemed remarkably similar. If
this case could be shown to be linked to the murders, then it was an
important breakthrough as Teresa's description of her attacker and
his van matched Black exactly.
By the end of 1990 the police had gathered a mass of
circumstantial evidence against Black, but unfortunately they had no
forensic evidence and no confession. They decided to
re-interview Black more rigorously, but for three days he refused to
answer any of their questions, as was his right. The police
had no real choice but to proceed with what they had. In May
1991 the police submitted their report to the Crown Prosecution
Service who would decide whether to go ahead with a prosecution.
In April 1992 Black was served with ten summonses.
|