
|
It was a hot afternoon on the
penultimate day of July in 1982, and 11-year-old Susan Maxwell had
asked her mother, Liz, if she could cycle to the tennis game which
she was going to play with her friend Alison Raeburn. Liz was
reluctant to let Susan cycle on her own as she was worried about the
traffic, but after some consideration she told her daughter
that she could walk if she liked. Susan had never yet walked
anywhere alone, but at some point a child has to be allowed to start
the process of independence. The Maxwells lived in a farmhouse
outside Cornhill on Tweed, a small village on the English side of
the English-Scottish border. Susan’s tennis game was across
the Scottish border in Coldstream, about two miles from her home,
and on a route where Susan would know most everybody she passed on
the way. It was an area where people looked out for one
another - particularly for the children.
|
|
In the end Susan didn’t walk to her
game as one of the farm-workers going into Coldstream offered her a
lift, but she planned to walk back. When four o'clock came and
it was time for Susan to be walking home, Liz decided to go and pick
her up. Liz remembers, “She wasn’t expecting me. But
I thought, ‘It’s a very hot afternoon; after she’s been
playing tennis for an hour, she’ll be hot and sticky and too tired
to walk back.’ So I put the wee ones in the back and we went
over.” On the way there, where Liz was expecting to
encounter Susan on her way home, there was no sign of her. At
the Lennel Tennis Club and on the return journey to the farm, Susan
was still nowhere to be found. A phone call to Susan’s
friend Alison quickly established that she had left Susan making her
way home. “I started to panic then”, said Liz, “and
Fordyce [her husband] said to just phone the police straightaway.”
The police were called and inquiries
swiftly began. Many people had seen Susan that afternoon, both
people who knew her, and people who simply remembered a little girl,
dressed in yellow, swinging a tennis racket. These sightings
of Susan were numerous until a certain point just over the Tweed
bridge, yards across the border into England. She was seen as
she crossed the bridge by several people at about half past four and
then she was gone. Nobody had seen her abduction, but in the
space of a moment she had vanished.
The days after Susan’s presumed
abduction were spent meticulously combing the countryside and
looking for clues to her disappearance. After the Northumbria
police appealed for volunteers nearly two thirds of the population
of Cornhill joined in the search. Fordyce himself went out
every day with the search parties. As the Maxwells were
journalists themselves, they spoke to the press constantly in the
belief that it could only be beneficial to keep Susan in the public
eye. It was after one such media event that the news which
they had been dreading finally arrived, two weeks after Susan’s
disappearance. On Friday 13 August Liz and Fordyce had been on
Radio 2 talking of Susan’s abduction and appealing to the public
for information. When they returned, the police were waiting
for them. Liz recalls: “He [the officer] said they’d found
a little girl. And I remember he wouldn’t say the word
‘dead’. He just said: ‘This little girl is not alive’.
And that was when the sort of coldness spread right through me.”
A man named Arthur Meadows had found
Susan’s body. It was in a ditch next to a lay-by on the A518
road at Loxley, just outside of Uttoxeter in the Midlands, 250 miles
from where Susan had been abducted. When Liz and Fordyce asked
if they could see their daughter's body, the officer - as tactfully
as he could - replied that the weather had been very warm. The
body had decomposed beyond recognition after two weeks in the hot
summer sun, meaning that Susan was only able to be identified by her
dental records. The pathologist was not even able to determine
how she had died. The only clue was that Susan’s pants had
been removed. Her shorts were then replaced, her pants folded
beneath her head. This confirmed suspicions that the motive
for the attack was sexual, though what form this took has never been
established.
As Susan's body was found in
Staffordshire it was the job of the Staffordshire police to lead the
murder hunt, although they worked closely with the Northumbria
force. Witnesses of Susan's 'final walk' were re-questioned,
and people who had been in the area where Susan's body had been
found were located and interviewed. Photographs of the girl
were widely distributed and a reconstruction staged to prompt
flagging memories; hotels and caravan sites were visited to elicit
information on visitors to the area at the time of the murder, who
were subsequently questioned. Drivers from transport firms
between Scotland and Staffordshire were interviewed. One of
the most promising leads came from Mark Ball, a psychiatric nurse,
who claimed to have seen a little girl matching Susan's description
hitting out at a maroon Triumph 2000 with a tennis racket on the day
Susan was abducted. His evidence was finally dismissed by the
police, although not until some 19,000 drivers of maroon Triumphs
had been questioned.
After almost a year the inquiry began
to draw to a close. The manual database now comprised of
about 500,000 hand-written index cards. Yet despite all the
data, the investigation had reached a dead end; and like the
Yorkshire Ripper inquiry, the investigation was also in imminent
danger of swamping the police by generating such an immense amount
of un-computerised information. Tragically, as is so often the
case, it took another murder to provide the police with new
information to get the investigation under way once more.
A year later, on 8 July 1983, in the
seaside resort of Portobello on the outskirts of Edinburgh,
five-year-old Caroline Hogg had been having a nice day. That
afternoon she had been to a friend’s party and after returning
home for dinner she took her grandmother to the bus-stop with her
mother, Annette. They returned just before seven o’clock
that evening and Caroline, who was still lively, begged her mother
to let her go down the road for a few minutes play before bed-time.
It was quite usual for Caroline to go to the playground, which was
just a short walk from their house, and Annette said she could go
for five minutes. Like Coldstream, Portobello is a small
community where the residents all know each other. Besides,
Caroline had always been told never to talk to strangers and was
forbidden to go past the park to the promenade or the permanent
fairground, Fun City.
|
 |
Fun City
(Atlantic Syndication Partners) |
At 7.15 Annette, who had told Caroline
to be just five minutes, sent her son Stuart to look for his sister.
When he came back, unable to find her, Annette herself went out and
soon the whole family were looking for Caroline. The police
were called at just before eight o’clock. Many people had
seen the little girl that night, and some of the sightings were of
Caroline with her abductor. There were reports of Caroline
holding hands with a “scruffy man”. This man was seen
looking at the girl in the playground, and then at Fun City, the
place forbidden to her, where he paid for her to go on the
children’s roundabout. They were last seen walking out of
the back entrance of Fun City, still holding hands.
|
|
As they had in the previous summer,
the police quickly set up search parties. Caroline was
abducted on Friday, by Sunday the police had more than 600
volunteers who went over every inch of the local area for any sign
of her. A week later this number had risen to some 2,000
people. It was the largest search ever carried out in Scotland
but they would find nothing, as Caroline, like Susan, had quickly
been transported many miles south. Unlike the Maxwells,
Annette and John Hogg spoke only once to the media, in a
press-conference where John begged to her abductor, “just bring
her back... Please, let her come home”; Annette, crying, told the
public, “We really miss her. I really miss her.”
There seemed to be no leads, as Superintendent Ronald Stalker
candidly told the press, “I am afraid that all we have to say at
this stage is that we have turned up nothing at all.”
Caroline’s body was found on 18 July
in a lay-by at Twycross in Leicestershire near to the A444, the road
that goes from Northampton to Coventry. Her body had been left
some 300 miles from where she had been taken just as Susan’s had
been, yet their bodies were found within just 24 miles of each
other. It had been ten days since Caroline had disappeared and
again the body was so decomposed from the hot weather that the cause
of death was a mystery. She was identified by her hair-band
and locket. Even more clearly so this time, the motive was
sexual: Caroline’s body was completely naked.
Because of the obvious similarities in
the murders of Susan and Caroline it was decided by the Chief
Constables of the four forces now involved - Northumbria (where
Susan was abducted), Staffordshire (where Susan was found),
Edinburgh (where Caroline was abducted), and Leicestershire (where
Caroline was found) - that the investigations into the murders
should be made into a joint inquiry. In July 1983 the Deputy
Chief Constable of the Northumbria police, Hector Clark, was put in
charge. From the outset Clark had been told that part of his
objective in this inquiry was to see how computers could be used to
aid such an investigation. It was the first opportunity since
the Yorkshire Ripper inquiry for the police to see how the early use
of computers in a serial murder investigation could be beneficial.
As the amount of data from the Susan
Maxwell investigation alone was immense Clark thought that the joint
inquiry would be most efficient if this was computerised, which
would involve transcribing all the manual files onto a computer
database. The Caroline Hogg inquiry would be fed into the same
database as it progressed. The idea was right, yet it was not
given the go-ahead as it was felt that too much time would be spent
in back-converting the files. Instead a computer programme was
written for the Caroline Hogg inquiry alone, and the Susan Maxwell
investigation was to remain manual.
In Portobello, witnesses on the
Promenade and at Fun City were interviewed, and house-to-house
inquiries were made; in Leicestershire, officers sat for weeks by
the A444 taking down the registration numbers of cars that passed.
LIO's (local intelligence officers) from every force in the entire
country were asked to draw up lists of possible suspects. The
houses of men who were established to have been on the promenade
that night for 'immoral purposes' were searched; holiday-makers from
as far as Australia were asked to send in rolls of camera or
cine-film they had taken in Portobello. A reconstruction of
Caroline's last journey was staged; parking tickets issued in
Edinburgh were examined; and an artist’s impression was drawn up
of the 'scruffy man' which prompted more than 600 names to be put
forward by the public. Perhaps the most hopeful lead was from
a Mr and Mrs Flynn who saw a blue Ford Cortina with a man and a
“scared-looking” young girl in it. 20,000 drivers of blue
Cortinas were interviewed. Unfortunately, as with the maroon
Triumph, the lead turned out to be a red herring.
At the beginning of the summer of 1984
the police were in a similar situation to that of the previous
summer. They had been diligent, they had collated a huge
amount of information, yet they had no real leads, no suspects.
|
|

|