|
To the living we owe our respect, to the dead we owe
nothing but the truth.
Voltaire.
Like all statistics, they serve a purpose of sorts.
Like most statistics, they only hint at a deeper, unseen truth,
hidden from view behind the dry, formal and dialectic structure of
numbers.
She was 28 years old. Her height was five feet two
inches and she weighed 103 pounds. She was well nourished and her
body showed evidence of proper care and attention.
She was also very dead with a fracture-dislocation
of the spine and a two-inch gap and transverse separation of the
spinal cord. Just to make sure, there was also a fracture of both
wings of the hyoid and the right wing of the thyroid cartilage. The
larynx was also fractured.
She had died of injuries to the central nervous
system, consequent to judicial hanging. She was a healthy subject at
the time of her death. So said Doctor Keith Simpson, pathologist of
146 Harley Street and Guy’s Hospital. He was a reader in forensic
medicine at London University, so he would know all about the
statistics of death, especially as he had carried out the
post-mortem examination on her, just one hour after she had been
executed.
He knew nothing of the menage a trios that had
brought her to the pathologist table. He could not know that her
death would result in two people killing themselves and one dying of
a broken heart. Or of the lawyer, so despairing of his faith in the
law and the way it treated her that he would give up his career. Or
the man who travelled half way around the world to escape from the
certainty that he was partly to blame for her being here on this
cold, metal table.
The small, slight cadaver stretched out before him
was all that remained of a true tragedy of British justice. She was
a statistic, one that would haunt the conscience of the British
judiciary system for the next forty-five years.
Ruth Ellis was the fifteenth, and the last woman
hanged in England in the twentieth century. She was also the
unluckiest. She did not kill for gain and, had the judge allowed her
defence to be put to her jury, they may well have found her guilty
only of manslaughter. She, however, never thought so. She never
doubted in her own mind that she deserved to die for killing the man
she loved.
Her death would be the final exclamation mark in a
sad and tortured tale.
|