|
Henry Tudor, a descendent of the House of Lancaster, had a
tenuous claim to the throne of England. He was the son of a
commoner, Owen Tudor, who had married the widow of Henry V.
However, he had an ambitious mother and a number of significant
supporters. Two of these were Bishop Morton and the Duke of
Buckingham. Buckingham had been the primary supporter of
Richard III during the frenetic period between Edward IV’s death
and Richard’s assumption of the throne, but betrayed Richard and
joined the cause of Henry Tudor. Several reasons are given by
different authors for Buckingham’s defection. The first, and
probably the most reasonable, is that Richard reneged on promises to
transfer to Buckingham extensive properties. The second is
that Buckingham was repelled by Richard’s murder of the two
princes. Some theorists regard Buckingham as the most likely
murderer of the princes, perpetrated in order to secure Henry
Tudor’s claim to the throne. A variation of Buckingham’s
deed by some of the traditionalists camp is that Buckingham was the
murderer, following instructions from Richard to carry out the deed.
 |
Portrait of Henry Tudor,
later Henry VII, the successor to Richard III and the father
of Henry VIII (National Picture Gallery) |
Portraits of Henry Tudor present a thin-lipped, sly man,
much more likely to evince a response of distrust in the viewer than
the famous portrait of Richard III. Like all of the English
kings during the late medieval period, Henry was ruthless. He
justified the killing of Richard at Bosworth Field by declaring that
he had been declared king the day before the battle, thereby
classifying Richard as a traitor against the crown. He
conveniently dispatched to the headsman’s block Sir James Tyrell
after extracting a confession from Tyrell that he and two others
were the actual murderers of the princes. While he solidified
the Tudor hold on the crown for his son, Henry VIII, he was noted
for his mean and stingy nature.
|
|
When Henry landed in Wales in 1483 with his forces of
French mercenaries and English and Welsh rabble, he had lived half
of his 28 years outside of England. In some respects, he was a
foreign invader. But his noble supporters were intent on
toppling Richard and replacing him, even if it had to be with the
relatively unknown Henry Tudor.
If the Earl of Stanley had not kept his forces out of the
Battle of Bosworth, Henry might have been defeated, and Richard III
would have remained king.
One of Henry’s first acts as king was to see that
Parliament repealed “Titulus Regius,” the act by which Richard
had used to declare Edward IV’s children illegitimate. Now,
his future queen, Elizabeth of York, sister of the princes, was
legitimate and a proper wife for a king. However, by repealing
the act, Edward V and his younger brother were legitimate once
again. Hence, Henry was acknowledging that the princes were
dead, since, by restoring Edward V’s legitimacy, he was
acknowledging that the dead boy had been the rightful King of
England.
Whatever Henry’s personal traits, he gave his reign peace
and stability, ending the War of the Roses by uniting, in marriage,
the House of Lancaster, his family, and the House of York, his
wife’s family.
|