|
Delmas questioned Evelyn gently about her relationship with
White. She told of his initial kindness and how White had
gained the trust of her mother. She described in detail her
lunchtime visits and romps on the velvet swing.
Then, Evelyn spoke of her ruin. She told the courtroom
about the drugged champagne and yellow kimono. She described
her tears and screams in the same vivid detail that she’d employed
in the Paris hotel room with Thaw. The courtroom hushed in
shame, and even some jurors displayed visible outrage.
Delmas cleverly emphasized that Thaw had heard the same story, in
the same awful detail. Evelyn told of her husband’s tears and sobs
when she had related her tale. Yet, despite the ruin, Thaw
loved her enough to marry her.
Thaw’s face displayed anguish and love throughout the testimony
– as if he was reliving the pain all over again. Cynics
whispered that Thaw had learned some tricks of the trade from his
actress wife.
After a brief interval, the prosecution cross-examined Evelyn.
Jerome did his best to bring to light Evelyn’s unsavory past.
His questions implied that Evelyn knew well what the married
White’s intentions were. He called into question whether the
champagne had been drugged at all. She appeared nervous and
scandalized by his inquires.
“Did you love Stanford White?” he asked.
“No,” Evelyn replied.
“You hated him.”
“Yes.”
He pressed her harder. Why, then, did Evelyn continue to meet
White? Evelyn tearfully claimed to have resisted his caresses, but
she and her family depended on his support. In addition, White
had forcefully insisted on seeing her. Jerome brought up the
deposition Evelyn had made against Thaw, but Evelyn claimed she’d
made the deposition under duress.
Jerome’s attempt to portray Evelyn as a promiscuous liar
backfired. Public sympathy remained with the young woman who
pleaded for her husband.
The jury, however, returned without a verdict. Five jurors
insisted Thaw was not guilty by reason of insanity. Seven believed
him guilty of first-degree murder.
Nine months later, a second jury found Thaw not guilty by reason
of insanity. The judge directed that he be incarcerated at an asylum
in Matteawan. Thaw rode to the asylum on a private train car, packed
with friends. They enjoyed whiskey, champagne and a fine meal,
and crowds cheered Thaw’s arrival. Evelyn did not join him
for the journey.
After a few unsuccessful attempts to win release or a transfer to
a private facility, Thaw escaped from Matteawan to Canada. An
outraged Jerome saw to it that Thaw was returned to the states and
jailed. Alas, Jerome’s pursuit was little more than a gesture.
Thaw had reached folk hero status, and the courts eventually found
him sane and set him free.
Many agreed with Jerome that his release was a gross miscarriage of
justice. In strict legal terms, he was guilty. Thaw was aware
of what he was doing and that it was illegal and wrong.
However, there is also little doubt he suffered from severe mental
illness his entire life. Had Thaw been born a century later, he
likely would have benefited from medicine and psychiatric care that
would have controlled his rages. At the very least, the murder would
have been prevented.
|