|
Murder trials during the nineteenth century were
a significant form of entertainment, especially when they involved
surprises. Sometimes they involved surprises even when the trial was
over and the verdict in. There was no HBO, MTV, or even radio at the
time, so the public avidly read newspapers or assembled outside the
courthouse, and the journalists catered to prurient interests. Most
of the time, crime was fairly mundane and obvious, but occasionally
the characters who came onstage were so unexpected that even daily
papers could hardly feed the public's hunger to know every salacious
detail.
In 1849, such a murder trial took place at
Harvard Medical College in Boston, and not only were both the offender
and victim from the more prestigious classes, but the details of the
killing and body disposal were fairly disgusting. It was difficult to
even identify the victim with certainty, and that meant relying on
experts.
 |
| Harvard Medical College |
At that time, the legal process was just
beginning to acknowledge that criminal investigation could be
approached with some degree of scientific technique. Fingerprints had
been used in ancient times, there was some use of physical evidence
matching, and Eugene Francois Vidocq had established the world's first
detective agency in Paris. Ink dye had been analyzed on documents,
poisons found in body tissues, and blood analyzed on surfaces. Only
twenty-one years before this trial, the first polarizing light
microscope had been invented. In 1839, Scotland Yard caught a
murderer through bullet comparisons with a mold, and the first
primitive semen analysis for sexual homicide was underway.
 |
| Jessica
Synder Sachs’ Corpse: Nature, Forensics,
and the Study to Pinpoint Time of Death
|
However, there had not yet been forensic
anthropologists or dentists in American courts, or medical personnel
to attempt to establish time of death. According to Jessica Synder
Sachs, in Corpse, these early days were filled with
pseudo-professionals making unfounded claims about their ability to
make accurate determinations. The trial of John Webster for the
murder of George Parkman marked a turning point for the use of doctors
as expert witnesses. "Over the next twenty-five years," she writes,
"the United States moved rapidly to integrate medical experts into its
antiquated coroner system, with one state after another authorizing
coroners to employ physicians to assist in their investigations of
homicides and suicides."
Thus, this was a precedent-setting case that
changed the entire process of death investigation in the U.S. and made
a significant impact on the trial system.
Let's take a look at what happened.
|